Empty thoughts and mutterings

Friday, January 27, 2012

Stop this retirement madness

After a really bad series like the one we are in, it is critical not to over react. Don't get me wrong - I am saying that we need clear and sure corrective actions but dropping the
wrong player or expediting the wrong player's retirement will also hurt India's recovery process. As Indian cricket fans we are all hurt by how badly we lost this series. Some Ex-players
call for axing of basically all the senior players - without realizing how irresponsible their comments are.

Cricket fans (Indian fans particularly) have the tendency to confuse bad form/technical flaws with aging. Several fans called for Sachin's head when he was going through a rough patch in 2007. Looking back at the past few years - would that have been good for India? - Absolutely not!

I also believe in the Australian way of retirements (for our board in the future). We don't need to squeeze every ounce of cricket from our legends. I think Steve waugh, Mark Taylor, Allan Border etc were good for a few more hundreds when they retired. The board should discuss retirement plans with the player well ahead of time and these plans have to be executed (with all reasonable concessions made). This would also allow the younger cricketers to be groomed in time. All it takes is reasonable long term planning which will prevent us from staring at 3 debuts (or close to it) and 3 retirements in a few months time frame. This medium to long term approach seems to be severely lacking with the committees appointed by BCCI.

The decision to drop legends should be made based on objective comparisons. The fact that a player didn't do well in a series shouldn't automatically lead to a decision to drop him.
For eg: Sachin had a very poor series by his standards - but make no mistake about the fact that he's still the best batsman we have for his position in India.

As for aging criteria - I think it is best judged by how the player moves on the field and his reflexes. Laxman still has signs of his lazy elegance and will still be able to get a few big scores here and there - but he's clearly slowed down on the field (not that he was fast before - but he was at the very least a safe slip fielder). Dravid's reflexes have also started to fail him. Our slip cordon once extremely reliable, is a shadow of what it was.

Dravid's failure this tour in my opinion was due to a new-born technical flaw. In the lifetime of a first class cricketer (even the technically superior ones), you see some technical flaws and bad habits creep in before getting subsequently sorted out. The gap between the bat and pad that Hilfenhaus used to his advantage, was the cause for his bad run. This should not be confused with aging.

Will talk about Dhoni the captain and Dhoni the WK in a separate post.

6 Comments:

  • i dont know why you are such a huge fan of retaining dravid, vvs....
    sachin - i can see, at least he can run reasonably fast...
    bcos of dravid and vvs we are losing 30-40 runs during fielding, 30-40 runs during running b/w wickets (if they stay long enough to score a 50 let us say).
    with budding younger generation - like rohit, raina still waiting... i know raina has failed against the shorter balls, but i wud give him a chance still...(i am a big fan of raina and GG, letseee how they turn out in test cricket)
    this is the best time to let VVS & RD go....and i am surprised that not even one of them announced their retirement....hopefully they do....
    MSD - lets discuss another time :)

    By Blogger Prabhu, at 8:36 PM  

  • Prabhu - I am not saying we should retain Dravid. I am just saying we should look at things for what they are. I agree with what you have said about his fielding and running between the wickets.

    Is his batting failure in the OZ series because he has aged? - I say no to that. It wasn't very long ago that he did well against England.

    By Blogger dinesh, at 8:42 PM  

  • Selectors in India don't have that kind of power to drop SRT and the like or to discuss and tell them their retirement plan (there are far too many 'other interests' involved).

    Don't think BCCI has been interested in any long term planning. Their interests are else where.

    I don't think Indian cricket is known for putting country first before players and I don't think this will change.

    Clarke today spoke about doing everything that will help them become No.1 again when asked about Ponting and Hussey.

    We will talk about SRT's 100th century, Dravid's England success, VVS' great success against Aus and the like.

    Prabhu

    By Blogger PRabhu S, at 11:46 PM  

  • Prabhu S - Great points. Agreed. Given all the points you said, I still think if you have the right people at the helm the attitude can be altered. After all, the selectors are paid to track retirement plans, transition plans etc - if you don't have a long term vision as a selector, you have failed in your duties! I know there are a number of constraints & shifted priorities with the Board and the stats/legacy loving public - we have to start somewhere don't we?

    By Blogger dinesh, at 6:57 AM  

  • Good one Dinesh..the biggest issue I have is the state of denial we are in...i have a feeling the BCCI will "re look' at test.cricket after the retirement of the fab 3\4..we missed a.huge opportunity to blood Pujara/mukund and have them play in tandem with sachin/dravid/laxman...btw I m a die hard lax fan..but feel he is past his expiration date..

    By Anonymous Bala, at 3:18 PM  

  • Hi Dinesh,

    I noticed that in one of your old posts you had mentioned the Diwali 87 rubber-deciding match between Ramesh and Masur. I blogged a little about it years ago : http://thetalkativeman.blogspot.com/2007/10/davis-cup-semi-final-1987.html
    Actually it was much before Diwali...10/4/87 was when Ramesh took India home at Sydney. Diwali day featured the Windies Sri Lanka World Cup match(10/21) where Windies won despite Ranatunga's brave 86.

    By Anonymous ThetalkativeMan, at 4:17 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home